Name your heirs
Who inherits, at which address, in what share. Frozen at opening: nobody, including the agent, can redirect a payment later.
No seed phrase in a drawer. No guardian committee voting on whether you are alive. Your estate sits at an address with no private key, and the only thing that can move it is your own silence.
Who inherits, at which address, in what share. Frozen at opening: nobody, including the agent, can redirect a payment later.
An agent watches for your check-ins and pays rent every second from its endowment. Anyone can feed it; it can earn its own keep.
Check in whenever you like. Go silent past the grace period and the estate settles to your heirs, signed by NEAR's MPC network.
The difference between them is the whole design.
The agent ran out of money first. Nothing is distributed, the estate is untouched and still yours, and the lapse is announced publicly so your heirs learn the watch stopped instead of discovering it years later.
You went silent past the grace period. The estate goes to the heirs you named, in amounts fixed when silence was declared, and the watchman's last act is its purpose.
The agent submits transaction fields. The contract re-encodes them as EIP-1559 itself and asks the MPC network to sign the digest it computed, and only after these checks pass.
Nobody. The address is NEAR's MPC root key tweaked by this contract and a path namespaced to your account. Signing needs a threshold of NEAR validators, and they answer only this contract.
That is what the grace period is for, and it should be weeks, not minutes. Even after silence is declared, checking in discards the plan until the last signature lands.
It starves, publicly. A dead agent cannot distribute anything, even if you are provably silent. Your estate stays yours, and only you can revive the watch.
No. It can delay a settlement or under-report a balance, which strands funds at a keyless address for a replacement agent to settle. It cannot move one wei to an address you did not name.